Hiroki Naganuma

Day1 (7/6 Mon)

HND->GMP

Day2 (7/7 Tue)

Day3 (7/8 Wed)

Day4 (7/9 Thu)

Thoughts

In the optimization sessions I attended, I noticed fewer Stanford and CMU affiliations than I expected, though this may simply reflect my own session selection.

The work that stood out to me came from a broad set of places, including UBassel, ISTA, EPFL, Flatiron, Mila, Vector, Meta, Google, and KAUST.

Several papers were close enough to my own research interests that they reminded me to be more careful about positioning, related work, and citations.

One recurring lesson was that strong research usually comes from deep domain fluency rather than frequent shallow pivots.

In optimization, many productive researchers seem to have spent time in leading groups, and informal conversations often revolve around research lineage, internships, and shared technical context.

Conversations with researchers from different academic environments also highlighted a trade-off between intense publication pressure and having enough space to pursue longer-term, more selective research directions.


Papers I Should Understand More Deeply


Small Research Ideas to Develop


Acknowledgements

I want to thank my PhD supervisor Ioannis Mitliagkas (Mila, UdeM) and Irina Rish for supporting my participation in the ICML.